Hotel owner, Duncan Bannatyne (of Dragons Den fame), has spoken out strongly about guests leaving negative reviews about his hotels on TripAdvisor (the world’s largest consumer review travel site) and how such unchallenged comments can seriously damage a hotel’s hard earned reputation.
TripAdvisor is a pioneer of user-generated content. Set up 10 years ago in USA, it allows travellers to pass on their holiday experiences for the greater good. Its 18M registered users find it immensely useful but hoteliers don’t see it that way at all.
Travel expert Sara Benson mentions that TripAdvisor used to be full of great comments from savvy, experienced travellers, but now it’s just a tidal wave of raw data. With an estimated 25,000+ legally defamatory comments currently on site both here and in the USA, hoteliers like Mr Bannatyne, are asking for changes in the law so that people making posts on TripAdvisor are visible and accountable.
Emma O’Boyle (from TripAdvisor) advises that hoteliers use TripAdvisor’s private messaging system to air their concerns, while adhering to their private messaging guidelines. Mr Bannatyne has no problem with guests giving their honest opinions but he takes issue when these same guests start “trying it on” to get a bill reduction and rages at TripAdvisor’s inability to allow him to counter spurious inaccuracies. It is not uncommon for consumers to threaten a bad review in return for a refund.
Yet travelling customers love TripAdvisor and businesses continue to preach that their “customers are king” - until negative comments arise!
And there’s the rub. If someone says something unpleasant about your business on a review site, how do you ameliorate the situation? Are these sites more interested in allowing freedom of expression in an expanding online community or are they just scared of losing out to other comparable sites, so damage to business reputations from unsubstantiated comments is simply collateral damage?
But there’s another side...
In his article: Long Live the Web, Tim Berners-Lee, the founder of the world wide web, emphasises the threat of closed systems (operated by the likes of Facebook, iTunes, Friendster) as having too much influence on your freedom to comment.
Berners-Lee sees companies like Facebook chipping away at the web’s fundamental principles. Facebook is a closed silo. Once you’ve added your details, you cease to operate in an open market. You lose real control which threatens your very liberty and your freedom to say whatever you want.
Will we all end up like those in China, Burma or Iran - without realising it?
Berners-Lee believes the social networks constitute a danger to continued open standards and neutrality. Perhaps, Duncan Bannatyne’s battles with TripAdvisor are another step in curbing our freedom of expression!
However, Patricio Robles, a reporter for E-consultancy, talks about the web being a market place with multiple vendors. If you don’t like iTunes you go somewhere else. Can’t find a store you like? Well, you’re free to start your own! Robles says the belief that there are people out there who know what’s best for you, is frankly fanciful.
Social comment is now mainstream and user based content accounts for 25% of all traffic to the websites of the top 20 global brands. These big brands wouldn’t change this for the world.
Like stone, paper, scissors, the freedom to click will continue to beat any attempts at censorship within social media sites.
Principle Sources: Kira Cochrane:. Rooms with reviews. Guardian News and Media. 25th January 2011
Tim Berners-Lee: Long live the web. www.scientificamerican.com 22nd November 2010
Patricio Robles: Berners-Lee: the most popular services are bad for the web. E-consultancy. 24th November 2010.